Adsterra vs AdThrive vs Mediavine: Which Delivers the Highest RPM?

Short version: For many publishers focused on Tier-1 (US, UK, Canada, Australia) audiences, Mediavine and AdThrive (Raptive) typically deliver the highest, most consistent RPMs for content sites—especially in premium niches—while Adsterra can outperform on certain traffic types (social, push, Smartlink/Direct Link, non-standard formats) and for sites that can’t yet meet the eligibility requirements of the managed networks. Below you’ll find a deep, practical comparison, real-world RPM ranges, optimization tactics, and how to decide which network is best for your site or portfolio. 

---

Why RPM matters (and how the networks calculate it)

RPM (Revenue per Mille / per thousand) is the single metric most publishers use to compare monetization. It’s defined as:

RPM = (Total revenue / Total pageviews or sessions) × 1000

Different networks calculate baselines differently (pageviews vs sessions vs ad impressions), so always compare like with like. For example, Mediavine emphasizes Session RPM, which measures revenue per 1,000 sessions rather than pure pageviews—this can make their RPM figures look different from networks that report on impressions. Mediavine

When you compare networks, separate two things:

• Rate potential — the RPMs paid for the same audience and content vertical; and

• Practical yield — what you actually receive after taking into account fill rates, traffic quality, ad layout, revenue shares, and special formats.

---

Quick profiles — what each network is

Mediavine

• Model: Managed ad network for content publishers (full-service).

• Specialty: High RPMs for lifestyle, food, travel, parenting, and finance niches; strong header-bidding + Google Ad Exchange access.

• Requirements: Historically require substantial traffic (commonly reported thresholds: 50k sessions in the last 30 days; check current docs before applying). This makes Mediavine a scale play—quality over quick access. 

AdThrive (now Raptive / acquired by companies at times)

• Model: Managed a premium ad network that focuses on top US traffic.

• Specialty: Exceptional RPMs for US-heavy audiences; reputation for attentive publisher management and optimization. Revenue split historically favored publishers (often cited as 75/25) with strict quality and traffic requirements. AdThrive is known to be particularly strong for sites with a high US share and lifestyle/recipe/parenting verticals. 

Adsterra

• Model: Self-serve ad network + Smartlink/Direct Link affiliate-style monetization. Offers popunders, native, display, push, Smartlink.

• Specialty: Very flexible; often used by beginners, social traffic arbitrage, and publishers who monetize non-traditional traffic (social, redirects, Smartlink). Adsterra’s Smartlink can generate high short-term CPMs, especially on social or direct-link volumes where performance offers pay well. Case studies show publishers earning strong one-off results with smartlink/direct link setups. Adsterra+1

---

Eligibility and onboarding — who gets in?

Understanding eligibility is critical—networks with high RPM potential often gatekeep access.

• Mediavine: Requires significant traffic (commonly cited as 50k sessions / 30 days) and quality content that meets brand-safety standards. They also expect fast load times and compliance with policies. Because of the higher bar, publishers who qualify usually see an RPM uplift. 

• AdThrive: Also requires a strong US traffic share and a good-sized traffic. Historically, publishers report needing a high percentage of US visitors and consistent monthly traffic to join. When approved, revenue splits and premium demand tend to favor higher RPMs. 

• Adsterra: Low barrier to entry; most publishers can sign up quickly and start monetizing with different formats. Because of low entry friction, Adsterra is widely used by beginners, social publishers, and people experimenting with Smartlink/direct link formats. Adsterra+1

Practical implication: If your site is still growing or you rely primarily on social traffic or non-web channels, Adsterra gets your traffic monetized quickly. If you have established, US-heavy, brand-safe traffic and consistent sessions, Mediavine or AdThrive will likely yield higher, steadier RPMs.

---

RPM ranges — realistic numbers (what publishers report)

No network guarantees RPM; results vary widely by niche, geo, device, season, and ad formats. Below are realistic ranges observed in publisher reports and case studies.

Mediavine

• Session RPM typical range (US-heavy sites): ~$15–$35+ per 1,000 sessions; some premium niches (finance, B2B) or Q4 seasonality can push above $40 in peaks. Mediavine’s focus on session-based reporting and access to AdX often results in strong, stable RPMs. Mediavine

AdThrive (Raptive)

• RPM typical range (US-heavy sites): ~$20–$40+ per 1,000 impressions/sessions for strong US publishers. AdThrive’s management and premium demand often place it among the top-paying managed networks. Reports emphasize strong performance, especially for lifestyle and recipe/parenting publishers with US audiences. 

Adsterra

• eCPM / CPM range: Highly variable depending on format and traffic source. For display/pop/native with Tier-1 traffic, you might see $4–$15 CPM; for Smartlink/Direct Link offers on optimized social traffic or push traffic, publishers have reported much higher per-conversion earnings and sometimes high effective CPM equivalents depending on conversion rates. Adsterra case studies show publishers scaling to thousands in revenue when combining social traffic with Smartlink monetization. Adsterra+1

Cross-network observation: Managed networks (Mediavine, AdThrive) generally pay higher net RPMs for content sites with brand-safe editorial content and strong US/Tier-1 audiences, because they can access premium DSP demand (AdX, header bidding partners). Ad networks with flexible formats (Adsterra) can sometimes outperform on volume or specialized traffic types (social, direct link), but results are more campaign dependent and less predictable. Publift+1

---

How revenue splits and formats affect your RPM

• Managed networks (Mediavine, AdThrive) negotiate high-quality demand partnerships and optimize layout and header bidding. Although they take a revenue share, publishers typically receive higher RPMs net because the overall ad stack value is higher. Mediavine and AdThrive also provide site layout, speed optimizations, and account management that increase yield. Mediavine+1

• Self-serve networks (Adsterra) let you keep more control but also require more experimentation. Adsterra’s Smartlink and push/native formats can deliver strong short-term earnings—especially on social or non-organic traffic—but long-term sustainability depends on traffic quality and compliance.

Example: A blog with 100k monthly sessions dominated by US users might earn more net revenue migrating from a low-tier self-serve network to Mediavine because Mediavine’s header-bidding + AdX access can lift RPM substantially despite the revenue share.

---

Side-by-side: strengths, weaknesses, and who should use which

Mediavine — strengths & weaknesses

Strengths

• High Session RPM potential for Tier-1 traffic.

• Full-service optimization (header bidding, ad layout, site speed).

• Stable payments and premium demand. Mediavine

Weaknesses

• Entry threshold (traffic & quality) can be a barrier for smaller publishers.

• Requires compliance with strict policies and editorial standards.

Best for

• Mid-to-large blogs with consistent organic traffic and clean content (lifestyle, food, travel, finance).

---

AdThrive — strengths & weaknesses

Strengths

• Very strong RPMs for US audiences.

• Publisher-focused support and revenue optimization.

• High value for lifestyle/family/food niches. publisher-collective.com

Weaknesses

• High bar for US traffic share and total volume.

• Limited availability for non-US heavy sites.

Best for

• Publishers with a majority US audience and high traffic, seeking maximum RPM and white-glove service.

---

Adsterra — strengths & weaknesses

Strengths

• Low barrier to entry.

• Flexible ad formats (popunder, push, native, Smartlink) and quick payouts.

• Strong for social traffic and affiliate/direct link campaigns. Adsterra+1

Weaknesses

• RPMs are more variable and format-dependent.

• Some formats (popunders) may negatively affect UX and SEO if not used carefully.

Best for

• Small publishers, social traffic monetizers, affiliate marketers, and anyone needing instant monetization or experimenting with direct link/Smartlink offers.

---

Real-world migration examples (what publishers report)

1. Small food blog → Mediavine: Publishers who crossed the Mediavine threshold often report doubling or tripling RPM after onboarding due to better demand and layout optimization. Expect some ramp-up time as Mediavine configures header bidding and AdX. Mediavine

2. Lifestyle blog with US majority → AdThrive: Some publishers switch from Mediavine to AdThrive (or vice versa) based on revenue share and RPM performance; results vary, but sites with very high US share sometimes experience notable RPM uplifts on AdThrive. 

3. Social traffic & small publisher → Adsterra Smartlink: Publishers relying on Facebook/TikTok traffic often monetize better with Adsterra Smartlink or native formats than with managed networks that expect organic traffic. Adsterra case studies illustrate how targeted social campaigns paired with Smartlink can scale revenue fast—though the approach is more hands-on and conversion-driven. Adsterra+1

---

Practical steps to maximize RPM on each network

If you’re with Mediavine or AdThrive

1. Improve session quality: longer sessions and multiple pageviews = higher session RPM.

2. Focus on Tier-1 geos: US/UK/Canada/Australia users command higher CPMs.

3. Optimize layout for viewability: ensure above-the-fold ad viewability and fast load times.

4. Leverage seasonality: Q4 holiday demand often doubles or triples RPM in commerce niches.

5. Follow publisher guidelines: these networks prioritize brand safety—avoid policy violations that could reduce demand. Mediavine+1

If you’re using Adsterra

1. Split test formats: compare native, push, popunder, and Smartlink on the same traffic.

2. Segment traffic: route Tier-1 users to display/native units and social/push traffic to Smartlink, where conversion offers excel.

3. Optimize landing pages: faster pages lead to more impressions and better fill.

4. Monitor bots and invalid traffic: ensure high-quality sources to keep eCPMs stable.

5. Use Adsterra analytics + external trackers to attribute conversions and calculate effective CPMs for Smartlink offers. Adsterra+1

---

How to compare your actual yields (a short worksheet)

1. Pick a 30-day window where traffic is stable.

2. From each network, extract:

   • Total earnings (net to publisher)

   • Total sessions or pageviews (use the metric the network reports)

3. Compute RPM for each network using the same denominator (sessions or pageviews).

4. Adjust for time-of-year and any big campaigns.

5. Repeat across multiple months to average out seasonality.

This exercise reveals the real, net RPM you’re receiving—often very different from headline estimates.

---

FAQs

Q: Which network actually pays the most?
A: There’s no universal winner. For editorial, brand-safe content with strong US traffic, managed networks (Mediavine, AdThrive) usually produce higher net RPMs. For flexible traffic types, direct link/Smartlink networks like Adsterra can produce very high short-term returns but with higher variance. Mediavine+1

Q: Should I wait to join Mediavine/AdThrive or monetize with Adsterra now?
A: If you have the traffic and content quality to pass Mediavine/AdThrive, onboarding can increase long-term revenue. If you’re still growing or depend mostly on social traffic, monetize now with Adsterra and prepare your site to meet managed networks’ thresholds.

Q: How much of a difference does geography make?
A: Massive difference. US/Tier-1 geos typically produce 2×–5× the RPM of Tier-2/3 geos, depending on vertical and ad format. Managed networks leverage this demand more effectively. Publift+1

Q: Can I run both managed networks and direct ad networks?
A: Technically, yes, but most managed networks require exclusivity or specific placements. You can often combine networks on different sites or reserve certain inventory for programmatic demand while using direct networks for other channels—check contracts and policies.

---

Final decision framework — pick the best fit for your site

Use this decision tree:

1. Do you have 50k+ sessions/month (or the current threshold) and clean, brand-safe content?

   • Yes → Apply to Mediavine or AdThrive (test both if eligible).

   • No → Use Adsterra or similar self-serve networks to monetize and grow.

2. Is the majority of your audience US/Tier-1?

   • Yes → Managed networks will probably deliver the highest net RPM.

   • No → Adsterra or networks with better global coverage might be more profitable short term.

3. Do you rely on social traffic & direct link funnels?

   • Yes → Adsterra Smartlink + push/native is often superior. Adsterra+1

4. Do you value stability & hands-off optimization?

   • Yes → Mediavine/AdThrive provides managed optimization and stable payouts. Mediavine+1

---

Closing notes & resources

• Managed networks often require patience to qualify but reward publishers with higher, steady RPMs and less hands-on ad fiddling. Mediavine+1

• Self-serve/ad-tech networks like Adsterra are powerful for experimenters, affiliates, and social publishers who want quick monetization and highly converting offer rotations. Adsterra+1

• Keep monitoring your actual net RPM and churn out tests—layout changes, seasonal content, device targeting, and traffic source shifts will affect your bottom line.

Selected reading & cited sources for deeper verification:

• Mediavine — explanation of RPM & Session RPM. Mediavine

• Mediavine eligibility/requirements overview. Travel Blogging 101

• AdThrive (Raptive) model & publisher revenue split discussion. publisher-collective.com

• Adsterra Smartlink case study and Smartlink product info. Adsterra+1

• Market analysis: networks that reported high CPM availability (aggregated analyses). Read More